Ngāi Tūkairangi Trust · Kaitiakitanga with Receipts
Twelve diagrams in six chapters — from a visitor checking in at the gate, through the intelligence layer, to a QR code on an export box in a Japanese supermarket. Tap any diagram to zoom.
How a visitor check-in at the gate becomes governance intelligence
Traces the journey of a single visitor check-in — from the Onside app at the Matapihi gate, through biosecurity question validation, stand-down flag logic, data transfer, and into the Mauri Compass intelligence layer where it becomes compliance data, ecological correlation, governance reporting, and audit documentation.
Without Mauri Compass: days. With Mauri Compass: 90 seconds.
Side-by-side comparison of the incursion response workflow. The Mauri Compass path: open dashboard, select date range, click Generate Trace Report, PDF ready in 90 seconds, report to MPI same day. The manual path: call contractors one by one, search paper records, 2–3 days to compile, incomplete report with gaps flagged.
Three properties, one Trust account, one governance view
Shows how Matapihi (Tauranga Harbour), Heretaunga Plains (Hawke's Bay), and Tūranga (Gisborne) each connect to their own Onside account and feed into the Mauri Compass intelligence layer — biosecurity visitor logs, ecological monitoring, consent compliance, and cultural health scores — rolling up into a portfolio dashboard for the Ngāi Tūkairangi Trust board.
From data sources through intelligence modules to governance audiences
The complete platform picture: five data sources (Onside, field monitoring, consent records, GlobalG.A.P., Mauri Compass workshop scores) flowing into five intelligence modules, converging on the GIS layer where all data is spatially correlated, then flowing out to five output types and their respective audiences.
How a field observation becomes a Treaty relationship with receipts
Traces the journey of a single field observation — water quality reading, pest sighting, Mauri Compass score, visitor check-in, or consent monitoring check — through the intelligence layer and out to five evidence outputs: governance dashboard, audit trace report, Ahuwhenua Trophy submission, regulatory report, and funder report.
From platform data to trophy-ready evidence package
Shows how all five Mauri Compass modules — cultural health, biosecurity, ecological monitoring, consent compliance, and GlobalG.A.P. — contribute evidence to an Ahuwhenua Trophy submission, producing a written submission, field day evidence pack, and presentation support.
Three seasons of investment, improvement, and recognition
A temporal arc showing how the 3-Kete scores change across three seasons. Season 1 establishes the baseline (2.6/5). Season 2 shows measurable improvement (3.2/5). Season 3 reaches 3.97/5 — the Ahuwhenua Trophy nomination year, with a three-season data trail as evidence.
Bronze → Silver → Gold: readiness gates, not timelines
The Trust's implementation journey across three phases — Foundation (biosecurity + baseline scores), Integration (all three properties + consent monitoring + Ahuwhenua Trophy submission), and Leadership (Gold certification + track & trace on export boxes + board governance dashboard). Each phase is triggered by a readiness gate, not a calendar date.
From first conversation to live dashboard in five weeks
The complete onboarding journey: discovery site visit and stakeholder mapping (weeks 1–2), facilitated 3-Kete workshop and baseline report (week 3), platform setup with Onside integration and team onboarding (week 4), and live dashboard with first governance report delivered (week 5+).
A QR code on every box — the full kaitiakitanga story for the customer
The complete track and trace story: on-property data collection (Onside check-ins, water quality, ecological observations, Mauri Compass scores, consent compliance) flows through the intelligence layer into the packing shed where a QR code is generated for every export batch. The customer scans it and sees the property map, Silver certification, biosecurity record, water quality data, and a statement from the Trust — at a premium price point in Japan, Korea, and the UK.
Māori data stays under Māori control — by design, not by policy
Shows the data sovereignty architecture: the Trust owns all data and can export or delete it at any time; role-based access control separates Trust admin, property manager, board member, external auditor, and Mauri Compass support; storage is encrypted at rest and in transit in Australian data centres; and four Te Tiriti-aligned principles govern all data handling.
From Regional Council consent register to annual compliance report — all 16 councils, API connected
The complete consent monitoring workflow: consent conditions entered from any of the 16 Regional Council registers (API connected), auto-generated monitoring schedule, field evidence capture (water quality checks, discharge monitoring, site inspections, event-triggered checks), compliance status tracking with GIS overlay, and four regulatory outputs: annual compliance report, consent renewal application, incident report, and audit response.